- About Us
- Our Work
- News and Events
We systematically examine how racial minority, low-income, and immigrant communities fare in the rescaling of decision-making about regional land use, transportation, housing, and water management.
We examine four case studies of the relationship between environmental justice concerns and regional planning in the diverse social, political and geographic landscapes of California’s Central Valley, a dynamic site associated with much of the state’s wealth, but also the focus of many of California's issues associated with growth and change.
The cases are situated in Central Valley locales currently engaged in regional-scale planning; together they encompass the main types of environmental decision-making in the Central Valley and Sierra Nevada regions.
By using a comparative case methodology, we will identify key social, ecological, economic and political variables that shape the equity outcomes of regional planning in order to offer an analysis that is both place-based and sensitive to broader trans-local factors.
How does regionalism affect the degree and kind of political voice accessible to typically marginalized populations?
How are issues of social equity foregrounded, sidelined, or otherwise framed in regional-scale planning?
How can disenfranchised communities engage with the complex scientific and technocratic knowledge associated with water, transportation, energy, waste-disposal, and land use systems?
Can a community-grounded science program contribute to social equity in regional planning?
We will conduct this research using a collaborative and interdisciplinary team drawn from the humanities, natural and social sciences. This study uses interdisciplinary methodologies to analyze and interpret the regional environmental planning process and policy outcomes relative to the goals of community organizations and environmental justice principles.
Why use collaborative and interdisciplinary research?
Regional change and regional planning are complex and environmental justice is multifaceted.
The actors involved in regional planning are themselves representative of multiple disciplines and agency cultures and require matching fluency and cultural competence from the research team.
Despite the necessity, such approaches to regional change are rare because of the complexity of integrating these disciplinary cultures.